The main research question of this scoping review was: What empirical research exists on how research ethics boards (REBs) identify and train members and ensure they have adequate expertise to review research protocols? The authors found a small and diverse body of literature from around the world. They summarized findings in four themes: scientific expertise; ethical, legal and regulatory training and expertise; diversity of identity and perspectives; and engagement with research participant perspectives. Studies reviewed identified issues for all aspects of membership expertise and training.
The authors of this study echo the calls of many of the authors of studies they reviewed: namely, education and support for all REB members needs to improve.